Skip to main content

Follow up - OT - Deuteronomy - Vole Study

Last week's lesson on Deuteronomy was about Heavenly Father teaching the Israelites to care for others with an open heart, and we linked this to animal altruism, where there have been cases of animals willingly helping others (in their own or other species) without any apparent self-interest involved. 

I introduced the hormone oxytocin and said that it had been shown to play a role in regulating the ability of animals to express complex caring behaviour. In experiments where scientists removed this hormone from voles, a species which is known for being monogamous and bonding for life, the affected vole partner would suddenly lose all interest in their mate. We used this idea of removing something important, and analysing the effects it would have, in our lesson, where we imagined that we had been commanded by Heavenly Father to NOT care for others, and we thought through what this would mean in our day-to-day lives.

The hormone removal experiment invited several questions from children who were curious about how this happened. The experiment is described in a 2015 paper titled "Central oxytocin receptors mediate mating-induced partner preferences and enhance correlated activation across forebrain nuclei in male prairie voles", which was published in the Hormone Behavour journal (link to paper).

Oxytocin functions by binding to a receptor protein in neurons in the brain, switching it on in the process. This switching on process leads to lots of follow-in activity that affects how some parts of the brain work, particularly in the hypothalamus, a region that affects hormonal control throughout the body. (The oxytocin receptor proteins can be found mainly in this region.)

The experiment functions by blocking the binding of oxytocin with its target receptor. This is done by introducing an "antagonist" drug which binds to the receptor instead of oxytocin, and blocks its switching on activity in the process. In the study, male voles underwent surgery to implant catheters into their brains, and these catheters were used to infuse the antagonist twice into the brains. (A control group received cerebrospinal fluid instead of the antagonist, to rule out the effects of the surgical procedure affecting the study results.) The results showed that the animals that received the antagonist were less involved in cuddling and intimacy with their partners than the control animals. 

Overall the lesson went well, the animal talent show part was well received, and this negative study got the children curious and involved in the discussions. 


A vole. Photo by Heather Wilde on Unsplash



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Idea Workup - OT - 1 Samuel

In my last post, I discussed some ideas for teaching 1 Samuel . In this post, I'll work up some of these ideas into a potential lesson plan.  Sometimes I get weeks where I toil for ages to find the right angle to teach a lesson from. Last week's lesson was a good example of this, where I really struggled to figure out a theme and a link that I could use. Other times, the right idea just hits you, and this feels like one of those weeks. There's a lot of material in 1 Samuel that could be used for a lesson, and it would be nice to devote more weeks to it. However the David and Goliath story is the dominant story here, and when you're working with young children, then you simply have to teach it. It's the archetype underdog story, which illustrates how the seemingly impossible can be made possible with faith. We want to pass on stories that will inspire the children and give them believe that they can similarly have confidence in themselves and aim high. We haven'

Lesson Plan - OT - Numbers 20

My next LDS primary lesson, on Sunday 15th May, will be on a section of the Book of Numbers from the Old Testament. The LDS Primary Come Follow Me lesson plan recommends focusing on Numbers 12 (where Moses' siblings expressed discontent at what Moses was doing), Numbers 21 (the story of the brass serpent) and Numbers 22 (the story of Ballam, the priest who was asked to curse Moses, but who refused to do so). I've been thinking about a different take on this lesson, which focuses on a story from Numbers 20 . It's going to involve some messy water play... Photo by Lubomirkin on Unsplash It tells the story of Moses carrying out a command from Heavenly Father: Crucially, whilst Moses was instructed to talk to the rock, he instead hit it, thus disobeying HF. The way this event unfolds is in contrast to an earlier, similar episode in Exodus 17 , where Moses is instructed to hit a rock, does so, and water emerges. The question is why did a seemingly small difference in Moses'

Brief update

For the time being, I'm going to switch formats for future lesson plans, and post my thoughts and plans on Twitter instead. Twitter's terseness makes it much quicker to write, which is ideal as I don't often have time to write the more expansive blog posts. (It's also perhaps a bit more readable too, for anyone with a cursory interest but who doesn't have time to digest the lengthier posts here.) At some point I'll come back and revisit this, with a view to having detailed lesson plans and explanations for as much of the scriptures as I can. In the meantime, you can find me over at  https://twitter.com/bobby_science .